Midtown Computer Systems Enterprise

Convenient web based access to our favorite computer related Usenet groups.
MCSE.MS is not affiliated with Microsoft corporation, Cisco corporation, Oracle, CompTIA or any other vendor.
Check our Computer Hardware forum | Cell Phones reviews

Go Back  MCSE > Microsoft software reviews > Windows 2000 review > Windows 2000 Networking


Windows 2000 Networking microsoft.public.win2000.networking

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-05, 06:13 PM
SeanVree
W2K Server bandwidth peaked
I have recently started to monitor the bandwidth on the internal NIC of my
2000 Server. I found that the bandwidth is at 100 constantly. I have also
noticed when accessing the server internally or from a VPN, that it is fairly
slow. Can the Windows Performance Monitor be trusted? If so, what should I
do to resolve this problem. If not, is there an 3rd part application that
would do the same thing so that I can get a "second opinion?

Thanks,

  #2  
Old 02-03-05, 09:12 PM
Ryan Hanisco
Re: W2K Server bandwidth peaked
The performance monitoring tools are usually good and I have never seen a
problem. The question then is: what do you use this server for? If it is a
DC this is indicative of something being horribly wrong. If it is serving
streaming video then it is completely likely... see my point.

Also, you say that it is "slow" when you connect to it... what does that
mean? Connect to it how?

We'll sort this out...

--
Ryan Hanisco
MCSE, MCDBA
Flagship Integration Services

"SeanVree" <SeanVree@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:36EAD245-0CFF-45E6-BF20-38C4A482D43B@microsoft.com...
>I have recently started to monitor the bandwidth on the internal NIC of my
> 2000 Server. I found that the bandwidth is at 100 constantly. I have
> also
> noticed when accessing the server internally or from a VPN, that it is
> fairly
> slow. Can the Windows Performance Monitor be trusted? If so, what should
> I
> do to resolve this problem. If not, is there an 3rd part application that
> would do the same thing so that I can get a "second opinion?
>
> Thanks,
>



  #3  
Old 02-07-05, 06:13 PM
SeanVree
Re: W2K Server bandwidth peaked
we only use this server for one database, it's called MAS.  However, it's a
faily large database. The only thing is, is that the usuage is still at 100
when no one is in the office using the database, so it doesn't make sense.

I mean slow, if an employee opens a VPN into the server using the same
databse application, it runs very slow.


Thanks Ryan.

"Ryan Hanisco" wrote:

> The performance monitoring tools are usually good and I have never seen a
> problem. The question then is: what do you use this server for? If it is a
> DC this is indicative of something being horribly wrong. If it is serving
> streaming video then it is completely likely... see my point.
>
> Also, you say that it is "slow" when you connect to it... what does that
> mean? Connect to it how?
>
> We'll sort this out...
>
> --
> Ryan Hanisco
> MCSE, MCDBA
> Flagship Integration Services
>
> "SeanVree" <SeanVree@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:36EAD245-0CFF-45E6-BF20-38C4A482D43B@microsoft.com...
>
>
>

  #4  
Old 02-09-05, 11:20 AM
wanderer wanderer is offline
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Re: Re: W2K Server bandwidth peaked
are you using the network interface/current bandwidth counter?  I have never seen this counter different than 100.  This does not mean you are using 100% of your bandwidth.  Read the explaination on the counter in perfmon.
This would explain why at 100 when no one is on.

Packets sent and recieved are better counters to use.

If you do have a bandwidth issue consider the following

1. go up to gigabit copper with a gigabit card in the server and a switch to support gig-e
2. consider teaming two 100mb cards to create a bandwidth of 400mbps. Intel nic have this feature and the software from Intel is free.
3. review your topology. Recommended setup is a high end backbone switch. It connects the servers and any down line devices like other switches. Eliminate any switch to switch to switch connections. Backbone to switch only. Best for bandwidth.
  #5  
Old 02-10-05, 06:12 PM
SeanVree
Re: W2K Server bandwidth peaked
Yeah, I am using interface/current bandwidth counter.

Well, I added the counters packets send and received, and they are both
below 10. So does this mean I'm OK?


"wanderer" wrote:

>
> are you using the network interface/current bandwidth counter? I have
> never seen this counter different than 100. This does not mean you are
> using 100% of your bandwidth. Read the explaination on the counter in
> perfmon.
> This would explain why at 100 when no one is on.
>
> Packets sent and recieved are better counters to use.
>
> If you do have a bandwidth issue consider the following
>
> 1. go up to gigabit copper with a gigabit card in the server and a
> switch to support gig-e
> 2. consider teaming two 100mb cards to create a bandwidth of 400mbps.
> Intel nic have this feature and the software from Intel is free.
> 3. review your topology. Recommended setup is a high end backbone
> switch. It connects the servers and any down line devices like other
> switches. Eliminate any switch to switch to switch connections.
> Backbone to switch only. Best for bandwidth.
>
>
>
> --
> wanderer
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via http://www.mcse.ms
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this thread: http://www.mcse.ms/message1398272.html
>
>

 


Popular forums
A+ (A Plus) Windows 2000 Active directory Exchange 2000 information store
Network+ Windows XP Security Exchange 2000 server administration
MCSE .NET Web services SQL Server
Cisco certification ASP .NET SQL 2000 Programming
Windows 2000 Registry .NET XML Viruses


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright MCSE braindumps 2003-2006